|
|
Post by crad519 on Oct 6, 2009 19:53:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by kstock07 on Oct 6, 2009 20:06:18 GMT -5
I read this earlier on yahoo and was baffled on how Kobe is 4th on this list with 4 titles, an MVP, and he is easily the best player in the league. Dirk I thought was a little high on the list but overall it was a good read
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Oct 6, 2009 20:06:26 GMT -5
Horrible, just horrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff on Oct 6, 2009 22:47:12 GMT -5
I agree with Timmy at 1.
Kobe should be 2 though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 7, 2009 3:22:26 GMT -5
As much as I hate Kobe, what more does he need to do? He's got to be 1 or 2 with a coin toss to decided between him and Duncan imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Oct 7, 2009 3:37:07 GMT -5
Keep Duncan at 1 for now but If Kobe gets anymore rings he'll be the better of the 2 when its all said and done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Oct 7, 2009 4:38:41 GMT -5
Yeah I wouldn't kick up a fuss about Duncan being #1 at all, I'm happy with him being there because he has bee dominant over the last decade, but KG doesn't deserve to be above Kobe imo, and I hate Kobe. I also think Dirk's too high, Shaq's too low, and if we're putting people on for being MVPs (which we kinda should be...) then where is Steve Nash? Back to back MVP's not good enough to crack the list?
|
|
|
|
Post by briarduck on Oct 7, 2009 16:26:41 GMT -5
Yeah I wouldn't kick up a fuss about Duncan being #1 at all, I'm happy with him being there because he has bee dominant over the last decade, but KG doesn't deserve to be above Kobe imo, and I hate Kobe. I also think Dirk's too high, Shaq's too low, and if we're putting people on for being MVPs (which we kinda should be...) then where is Steve Nash? Back to back MVP's not good enough to crack the list? I agree with what you say, Tim at one is fine but Kobe has to be second and a number of others should be moved around...this list just isn't good...oh well! |
|
|
|
Post by ducky on Oct 7, 2009 18:22:13 GMT -5
Kobe > KG
Wade > Kidd
Nash > Kidd
|
|
